PROFITABILITY OF SHEEP FINISHED ON MIXED SWARD DIETS IN KAJIADO COUNTY, KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.agrise.2024.024.3.4Keywords:
ASALs, Grass, Legume, Profitability, Weight gainAbstract
Availability of economical and easily accessible feeds that are high in both quantity and quality is a crucial factor in sustainable livestock production. The study aimed at determining the profitability of finishing sheep by supplementing using protein rich leguminous feeds. In a completely randomized experimental design, a group of 18 mass selected dorper yearling sheep, aged 17-19 months and an average body weight of 20.5±2.9 Kgs were assigned into 6 diet experimental units of 3 animals each. Analysis of variance and economic analyses showed Bush rye+Desmodium and African fox tail+Lucerne diets as the leading with net weight gain of 3.0±0.7 Kgs and 2.8±0.5 Kgs and profitable returns of Ksh 65,979.00 and Ksh 30,906.00 respectively for 100 units’ sheep establishment at the market live body weight price of Ksh 400/kg. Selection of a cost effective legume and right breed and genetics of the animal was an essential consideration for enhanced enterprise profitability.
References
Bista, D. R., Heckathorn, S. A., Jayawardena, D. M., Mishra, S., & Boldt, J. K. (2018). Effects of drought on nutrient uptake and the levels of nutrient-uptake proteins in roots of drought-sensitive and-tolerant grasses. Plants, 7(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7020028
Bosworth, S. C., & Cannella, M. P. (2007). Assessing on-farm pasture availability and forage quality for dairy feed planning. In The 2007 June, Joint AFGC and NEBCSA Conference.
Chaidanya, K., Shaji, S., Niyas, A., Sejian, V., Raghavendra, B., Bagath, M., & Girish, V. (2015). Climate change and livestock nutrient availability: impact and mitigation. http://14.139.185.57:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10816
FAO (2019). The Future of Livestock in Kenya. Opportunities and Challenges in the Face Uncertainties. Rome. pp 56. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en?details=ca5369en
Kenana, R. S., Onjoro, P. A., & Ambula, M. K. (2020). Relative palatability and preference by red Maasai sheep offered brachiaria and Rhodes grass hay supplemented with calliandra leaves in Kenya. https://www.veterinarypaper.com/pdf/2020/vol5issue5/PartA/5-4-41-537.pdf
Kipeto Energy Limited (2012). Geology and Soil Study Report for the Proposed 100MW Wind Energy Project, Kajiado District, Kenya. Kipeto Energy Limited.
Klahan, R., Krajabthong, K., Maksiri, W., Tamruangit, J., Whangchai, N., Pimpimol, T., & Whangchai, K. (2024). The influence of napier grass biomass mixed feed on the biorefinery indicator for Nile tilapia production. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14(1), 1251-1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04235-4
Lutta, A. I., Wasonga, O. V., Robinson, L. W., Nyangito, M. M., & Sircely, J. (2021). Determinants of livestock market participation among pastoral communities of Tana River County, Kenya. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(5), 7393-7411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00922-8
Manyeki, J. K., Kuria, S., Kidake, B., Maweu, A & Mulei, B., (2023). Fodder Farming in The Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya: A Potential Profitable Venture. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 14(3)18-24. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-1403041824, www.iosrjournals.org
Mayulu, H., & Suhardi, S. (2016). The feed intake and daily weight gain of locally sheep fed with amofer palm oil plantation and mill's byproduct-based complete feed. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 10(2), 67-73.
https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijse/article/view/12180
MoALF (2018). Climate Risk Profile for Kajiado County. Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Series. The Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MoALF) Nairobi Kenya. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/96288
Njarui, D. M. G., Mureithi, J. G., Wandera, F. P., & Muinga, R. W. (2003). Evaluation of four forage legumes as supplementary feed for Kenya dual-purpose goat in the semi-arid region of Eastern Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 2(2), 65-71.
Nyariki, D. M., & Amwata, D. A. (2019). The value of pastoralism in Kenya: Application of total economic value approach. Pastoralism, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-019-0144-x
Olalekan, A. J., & Bosede, B. F. (2010). Comparative study on chemical composition and functional properties of three Nigerian legumes (jack beans, pigeon pea and cowpea). Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(1), 89-95.
SDDA (2019). ASALs Categorization Report, State Department for Development of the ASALS (SDDA).
Sitorski, L. G., Bauer, M. L., & Swanson, K. C. (2019). Effect of metabolizable protein intake on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and feeding behavior in finishing steers. Translational Animal Science, 3(4), 1173-1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz124
Thang, C. M., Ledin, I., & Bertilsson, J. (2010). Effect of using cassava products to vary the level of energy and protein in the diet on growth and digestibility in cattle. Livestock Science, 128(1-3), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.12.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Benson Mulei, Simon Kuria, John Manyeki, Annastacia Maweu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
