Iranita Haryono, Astrini Padapi, Ayu Wulandary
  AGRISE,Vol 21, No 2 (2021),  121-126  
Viewed : 128 times


One of the efforts to achieve national food security is by strengthening assistance and counseling to farmers as the main actors. One of the extension links closest to the community and located at the sub-district level is the Peratanian Extension Center (BPP). The function and role of BPP is developed to achieve the desired expectations, namely food self-sufficiency and improvement of farmer welfare. Therefore, there is a need for a special study to be able to determine the level of responsiveness, responsibility and quality of agricultural extension services carried out by the BPP in Sidenreng Rappang Regency. This reserch aims to determine the performance of agricultural extension agents in Sidenreng Rappang Regency in terms of the level of accountability of agricultural extension activities based on indicators of responsiveness, responsibility and quality of extension services. The research was conducted from July to October in Sidenreng Rappang Regency. This research used a survey method. Determination of the sample of this study was carried out purposively on extension workers at the local BPP. Data collected descriptively by cross tabulation. Data analysis used scoring parameters, proportion, maximum, minimum and average values. The results show that the agricultural instructor's Performance Score is 294 which is interpreted into a moderate category score, which means that the ability of the BPP is sufficient to be able to recognize the needs of the assisted farmers, is sufficient to develop extension programs / activities that are in accordance with the wishes / aspirations of local farmers, and sufficient in providing service to farmers.


Agricultural Instructor Performance; Responsiveness; Responsibility; Service Quality

Full Text:



Danield C. Feldman. 1986. Individual in Organizations. New York: McGraw Hill, Series in Management. 32-52.

Departemen Pertanian. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor: 61/permentan/ot.140/11/2008 Tentang Pedoman Pembinaan Penyuluh Pertanian Swadaya dan Penyuluh Swasta.

Handoko, T. Hani. 1987. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumberdaya Manusia. BPFE UGM Press,Yogyakarta

Moh. As’ad. 1991. Pisikogi Industri . Ed.Library. Yogyakarta. P. 47-48

Lesmana, D. 2007. Kinerja Balai Penyuluhan Pertanian Kota Samarinda. Samarinda:https://agribisnisfpumjurnal.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/jurnalvol- 4-no-2-dina.pdf

Lukman Fuad. 2010. Analisis Kinerja Penyuluh Berdasarkan Persepsi Kelompok Tani Ternak Di Kecamatan Tompobulu Kabupaten Maros.Universitas Hasanuddinn. Makassardst.

Soenardi. 1989. Beberapa Faktor Lingkungan Kerja Yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan PPL Melaksanakan Tugasnya (Tesis), Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana, UGM

Sulistiyani Ambar T. dn Rosidah. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Pertama. Penerbit Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta

Thoriq M. As-Suwaidan dan Faishal Umar Basyarohil. 2005. Pemimpin Masa Depan, Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Van den Ban AW, Hawkins HS. 1999. Penyuluhan Pertanian. Yogyakarta: Penerbit KanisiuWard J, Peppard J, 2009. Strategic Planning for Information System. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.agrise.2021.021.2.5


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 IRANITA HARYONO

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.