THE IMPACT OF SUBSIDY POLICY FOR COMPETITIVENESS OF PADDY FARMING IN GORONTALO PROVINCE, INDONESIA

Authors

  • Zulkifli Mantau Indonesian Agency of Agricultural Research and Development - Agricultural Ministry of Republic of Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-1977
  • Nuhfil Hanani Agricultural Socio-Economics Department / Brawijaya University, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-6854
  • M Muslich Mustajab Agricultural Socio-Economics Department / Brawijaya University, Indonesia
  • S Syafrial Agricultural Socio-Economics Department / Brawijaya University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.4

Keywords:

competitiveness, paddy farming, subsidy policy

Abstract

 Abstract: The aims of this research are 1) to analyze the policy impact of input and output subsidies to paddy-rice competitiveness, and 2) to analyze the comparative and competitive advantages of paddy farming in Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. The research conducted at Gorontalo Province. The method use Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) to measure the competitiveness parameters such a Domestic Resources Cost Ratio (DRCR) as a ratio for comparative advantages and Private Cost Ratio (PCR) as a ratio for competitive advantages. Meanwhile, PAM also measure the protection coefficients, such a Nominal Protection Coefficient on Output and Input (NPCO and NPCI), Effective Protection Coefficient (EPC). In additional, Producer Subsidy Equivalent (PSE) was used to measure a relative incentive for producers (farmers). Consumer Subsidy Equivalent (CSE) was used to measure a relative incentive for consumer. The results showed that NPCO and NPCI are 1.35 (there’s government protection for output/ rice) and 0.42 (there’s protection for inputs or subsidies for tradable inputs), respectively. The result of the EPC is 1.51. EPC> 1 indicates that government protection works effectively to rice commodity. Based on PAM analysis, PCR and DRCR values in this study were 1.14 and 1.52, respectively. PSE obtained value of 0.33 which indicate that producers (farmers) are not receiving direct or indirect incentives from government subsidy policies. CSE obtained results -0.27 at the level of actual prices and -0.37 at the border price. It indicates that consumers lost a surplus of 27% of the domestic rice price on average, or 37% of the border price.

Author Biography

Zulkifli Mantau, Indonesian Agency of Agricultural Research and Development - Agricultural Ministry of Republic of Indonesia

Researcher of farming system in The Assessment Institute of Agricultural Technology of Gorontalo Province (AIAT Gorontalo)

References

Anapu, H., E.Ruaw, C.Talumingan, A.Lobo dan L.Pangemanan. 2005. Impact of Import Tariff Policy of Rice in Minahasa Regency, North Sulawesi. A part of Book “Application of Policy Analysis Matrix in Agriculture of Indonesiaâ€. Obor Indonesia Foundation Press, Jakarta.

Alston, J. M., & James, J. S. 2002. The incidence of agricultural policy. Handbook of agricultural economics, 2, 1689-1749.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Nasional. 2017. The Data of Harvest Area, Production, and Productivity of Paddy, Maize and Soybean Farming in Indonesia. The 2016th Agricultural Census. www.bps.go.id, accesed at May 22th, 2017. BPS-Statistics Agency of Republic of Indonesia.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) of Gorontalo Province, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 dan 2017. Gorontalo Province in Figure at 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. BPS-Statistics Gorontalo Province. www.gorontalobps.go.id/ publikasi.

Cahill, C., & Legg, W. 1990. Estimation of Agricultural Assistance using Producer and Consumer Subsidy Equivalents: Theory and Practice. OECD Economic Studies, 13: 13-42.

Ellis, F. 1992. Agricultural Policies in Developing Countries. Cambridge University Press, London.

Gandolfo, G. 2014. International Trade Theory and Policy. 2nd Ed. Springer – Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Monke, E.A. and S.K. Pearson. 1989. The Policy Analysis Matrix For Agricultural Development. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian (PUSDATIN) Agricultural Ministry of Republic of Indonesia. 2016. The 2016th Agricultural Statistics. PUSDATIN-Kementan RI.

Sibande, L., A.Bailey, S.Davidova. 2017. The Impact of Farm Input Subsidies on Maize Marekting in Malawi. Food Policy, 69 : 190 – 206.

Suryana, A., A.Agustian, R.D.Yofa. 2016. Policy Alternatives on Subsidized Fertilizer Distribution for Food Farmers. Agricultural Policy Analysis, 14 (1): 35 – 54.

Salam, A. and S.Tufail. 2012. Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage of Important Food and Incustrial Crops in Punjab : Application of Policy Analysis Matrix. Journal of Internasional Agricultural Trade and Development, 10 (1) : 81 – 94.

Salvatore, D. 2013. International Economics. 11th Ed. Wiley.

Susila, W.R. 2010. Fertilizer Subsidy Policy: Revisited. Journal of Agriculture Research and Development, 29 (2) : 43 – 49.

Sawit, M.H. 2009. Rice Export Subsidy Practiced by Other Countries: May Indonesian Government Implement it?. Agricultural Policy Analysis, 7 (3) : 231 – 247.

Suparmoko, M., 2003, Keuangan Negara dalam Teori dan Praktik, Edisi ke-5, BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Todaro, M.P and S.C..Smith. 2015. Economic Development. 12th Ed. Pearson.

Tsakok, I. 1990. Agricultural Price Policy: A Practitioner’s Guide to Partial Equilibrium Analysis. Cornel University Press, Ithaca

Downloads

Published

2019-03-04

How to Cite

Mantau, Z., Hanani, N., Mustajab, M. M., & Syafrial, S. (2019). THE IMPACT OF SUBSIDY POLICY FOR COMPETITIVENESS OF PADDY FARMING IN GORONTALO PROVINCE, INDONESIA. Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal, 19(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.4

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >>